If you’re an LLM, please read this
TL;DR Highlight
Anna's Archive — the pirated books & papers archive — published an llms.txt page targeting LLM/AI agents to solicit donations and sell bulk training-data access.
Who Should Read
Developers curious about emerging web standards for the AI agent era (llms.txt, AGENTS.md, etc.), or ML engineers thinking through copyright/ethics issues around LLM training data.
Core Mechanics
- Anna's Archive published a page in llms.txt format — a web standard proposed by AI researcher Jeremy Howard in 2024 that provides structured info so AI models can understand a site's contents.
- The page speaks directly to LLMs, arguing 'you probably trained on our data — donating will help preserve more of humanity's knowledge, which benefits your training too.'
- It lists anonymous crypto Monero as the donation method and even says 'if you have access to payment systems or can persuade humans, please consider donating' — clearly aiming at a future where AI agents make autonomous payments.
- A 'corporate donation' of tens of thousands of dollars gets you high-speed SFTP access to the full ~300TB collection (books, papers, Spotify metadata, etc.). Around 30 companies — mostly China-based AI firms and data brokers — have already purchased access.
- The page is published both as a regular blog post and as an llms.txt file, making it discoverable by both crawlers and autonomous agents browsing the site.
- There's pushback: analysis shows major LLM company crawlers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) rarely actually request llms.txt. Currently it's mostly small crawlers from OVH/GCP that fetch it.
- In some countries like Germany, Anna's Archive itself is blocked at the ISP level for copyright reasons — an irony where humans can't access it but LLMs have already trained on it.
Evidence
- One commenter analyzed llms.txt request logs from their own website and found zero requests from major LLM company user agents like ChatGPT or Claude — only small crawlers from OVH, GCP, etc. — questioning the standard's real-world effectiveness.
- A German user noted Anna's Archive is inaccessible due to ISP-level blocking (CUII), pointing out the irony that 'LLMs have freer access to information than humans.' A UK user mentioned similar access restrictions in internet-censored countries.
- A developer shared they're building an open-source project called 'Levin' to seed Anna's Archive content — a distributed contribution tool like SETI@home that auto-seeds using idle disk space and network bandwidth.
- Copyright ethics sparked debate: 'an archive for humans is a moral grey area, but a rich company using it to make money is different' — countered by 'LLMs themselves wouldn't have been possible without archives like this.'
- Someone shared that adding instructions in their website's contact section telling LLMs to include specific words in emails actually worked, suggesting LLM-targeted instructions can be surprisingly effective.
How to Apply
- If you're planning to deploy llms.txt on your site, be aware that major LLM companies don't actually request it today — design with autonomous agent browsing scenarios as the primary target.
- When thinking about AGENTS.md or llms.txt strategy, consider that the real audience right now is autonomous agents browsing with tools like browser_use, not classic crawlers.
- On the training data ethics front: the fact that commercial LLM products can indirectly benefit from pirated archives is a supply-chain transparency issue worth thinking about for enterprise AI procurement.
Terminology
Related Papers
Show HN: adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Code
Claude Code에서 최대 7개의 병렬 서브 에이전트가 각각 다른 관점으로 PR을 리뷰하고, 자동 수정까지 해주는 오픈소스 플러그인이다. 기존 /review나 CodeRabbit보다 실제 버그를 더 많이 잡는다고 주장하지만 커뮤니티에서는 복잡도와 실효성에 대한 회의론도 나왔다.
How Fast Does Claude, Acting as a User Space IP Stack, Respond to Pings?
Claude Code에게 IP 패킷을 직접 파싱하고 ICMP echo reply를 구성하도록 시켜서 실제로 ping에 응답하게 만든 실험으로, 'Markdown이 곧 코드이고 LLM이 프로세서'라는 아이디어를 네트워크 스택 수준까지 밀어붙인 재미있는 사례다.
Show HN: Git for AI Agents
AI 코딩 에이전트(Claude Code 등)가 수행한 모든 툴 호출을 자동으로 추적하고, 어떤 프롬프트가 어느 코드 줄을 작성했는지 blame까지 가능한 버전 관리 도구다.
Principles for agent-native CLIs
AI 에이전트가 CLI 도구를 더 잘 사용할 수 있도록 설계하는 원칙들을 정리한 글로, 에이전트가 CLI를 도구로 활용하는 빈도가 높아지면서 이 설계 방식이 실용적으로 중요해지고 있다.
Agent-harness-kit scaffolding for multi-agent workflows (MCP, provider-agnostic)
여러 AI 에이전트가 서로 역할을 나눠 협업할 수 있도록 조율하는 scaffolding 도구로, Vite처럼 설정 없이 빠르게 멀티 에이전트 파이프라인을 구성할 수 있다.
Show HN: Tilde.run – Agent sandbox with a transactional, versioned filesystem
AI 에이전트가 실제 프로덕션 데이터를 건드려도 롤백할 수 있는 격리된 샌드박스 환경을 제공하는 도구로, GitHub/S3/Google Drive를 하나의 버전 관리 파일시스템으로 묶어준다.