No signs of AI payoff outside the tech sector
TL;DR Highlight
Revenue per worker and margins rise at the Mag 7 but stay flat across the S&P 493
Who Should Read
A developer or team lead proposing LLM adoption who needs ROI evidence and faces token cost pressure
Core Mechanics
- No AI payoff outside tech
- The article says AI has delivered no financial payoff to corporate America outside tech.
- Revenue per worker and profit margins rise for the Mag 7 but are flat for the S&P 493.
- Productivity stats show nothing yet
- The author sees no sign of AI boosting productivity growth.
- The chart uses the San Francisco Fed's total factor productivity (TFP) series.
- Tokens are becoming a cost center
- Mainstream companies increasingly see token spend as a cost that weighs on margins, not as growth.
- VC-backed firms spend more on tokens, but mainstream firms won't pay for the latest model.
- Agent spend is confined to a small slice
- If agentic AI and token spending stay in a small part of the economy, macro effects will be very limited.
- Charts draw on the Ramp AI Index.
- Turning cheap intelligence into revenue is the test
- The question is whether mainstream firms can turn commoditized, cheaper intelligence into revenue and margin growth.
- The author says business intelligence is mostly judgment, which depends on context.
- AI lacks accountability and unwritten rules
- The article lists accountability, trust, culture, unwritten rules, ethical trade-offs and fairness as things AI does not understand.
- These shape reputational risk, revenue growth and margins.
Community Reactions
- Comparison to factory electrification
- Dropping an electric motor into a water-powered mill didn't work; the gains came from rebuilding the building.
- The view is that AI-native new companies will move the needle.
- It's early, plus the Solow paradox
- One commenter notes Amazon took decades to overtake Walmart, so diffusion takes time.
- Several comments quote Solow's 1987 line about computers and productivity statistics.
- Other industries lack test suites
- Software can use non-deterministic systems because tests act as validation gates.
- Other industries rely on manual checks, which can be slower and costlier than doing the work directly.
- Cutting work hours with a web chat
- One commenter says a contracts manager cut 8-hour days to a few hours using Claude's web chat.
- Such use isn't integrated into workflows, so it may not show up in statistics.
- Copilot check-processing was unreliable
- A commenter had Copilot generate rename commands for scanned checks in batches of 20 but often got only 15 lines.
- Failures worsened over long sessions and an upload limit eventually kicked in.
How to Apply
- Build an AI spend versus impact table
- In 30 minutes, pull monthly LLM API cost per feature.
- Add one time-saved or revenue metric next to each.
- Mark features with no metric as cost items.
- Test whether the latest model is needed per task
- Run 20 recurring tasks on a cheap model and the top model with identical inputs.
- If the accuracy gap is small, downgrade to cut token cost.
- Add automatic validation gates to AI output
- Put format checks and rule tests on LLM output in non-code workflows.
- Send only failures to humans to reduce manual review cost.
Try It
# Paste into Claude or ChatGPT (the article is economic analysis with no code, so this is a simple audit prompt)
You are an analyst auditing AI ROI. Below are the features in our service that use an LLM and their monthly cost.
{{feature list, monthly token cost, expected benefit}}
For each feature, make a table with:
1) One metric that can measure its impact
2) A test method to check whether a cheaper model is enough instead of the latest model
3) Candidate rules for automatically validating the output
Next step: classify features with an empty metric as cost items and decide whether to keep them.Terminology
Related Papers
A 10-year-old CNN outperforms frontier LLMs for skin cancer diagnosis
A fine-tuned Inception v3 beat GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 on 200 skin lesions
America has lost 200k of jobs in media, film and the arts. How much is AI?
US creative-industry jobs fell by over 200k in four years, but AI's share of the blame is hard to prove
LLMs are making formal software verification feasible at a much larger scale
Claude proved no-crash properties for 123 open-source libraries and found bugs along the way.
PHP2Shell: AI uncovers critical RCE in PHP
Wiz used AI to turn a decade-old PHP core flaw into a working RCE exploit
Using LLM for confidence scoring is a bad idea
An LLM's self-reported confidence is plausible text, not a measurement; build scores from outside rules.
The Judge Can Debias Itself: Awareness and Self-Debiasing for Reliable LLM-as-a-Judge
Warning an LLM judge about bias or letting it self-critique improved 20 of 21 model–bias combinations.
90% of US working hours are spent on tasks not covered well by AI benchmarks
Mapping 29 benchmarks to job tasks shows 90% of US working hours lack good coverage
Postgres 19 delayed after AI reviewers find more bugs than humans can fix
LLM code review surfaced so many bugs that Postgres 19 slipped to November and 8-10 features were reverted