“Erdos problem #728 was solved more or less autonomously by AI”
TL;DR Highlight
Terence Tao used AI tools (Aristotle + LLM) to formally prove unsolved math problem Erdős #728 in Lean.
Who Should Read
Mathematicians and CS researchers interested in AI-assisted formal verification, and ML researchers tracking AI's progress on math reasoning.
Core Mechanics
- Terence Tao (Fields Medal winner) used an AI tool called Aristotle in combination with an LLM to construct a formal Lean proof for Erdős conjecture #728 — a long-standing open problem.
- This is significant because it's not a toy problem — Erdős conjectures are real mathematical research-level challenges, and #728 had resisted proof for decades.
- The proof process was collaborative: Tao provided the high-level mathematical insight and strategy, while Aristotle/LLM handled the Lean proof formalization.
- The result was machine-verified — not just plausible but formally checked by Lean's type system, guaranteeing correctness.
- This demonstrates the emerging pattern: world-class mathematicians can now prove harder theorems faster with AI assistance than without.
- Lean proof assistants become a trust anchor — even if the AI makes reasoning mistakes, the proof checker catches them before they're accepted.
Evidence
- The Lean proof was made publicly available and verified by the community — not just a claim but checkable artifact.
- Tao himself described the experience as significantly faster than manual formalization, even with his deep mathematical expertise.
- HN discussion noted the importance of the 'Aristotle' tool specifically — it bridges between natural language mathematical reasoning and Lean's formal syntax.
- Researchers in the Lean community confirmed this is a meaningful result — Erdős #728 is a legitimate research-level theorem, not a textbook exercise.
- Comparison was made to AlphaProof's work on IMO problems — a pattern of AI enabling mathematical progress rather than replacing mathematicians.
How to Apply
- If you work in software verification, track Aristotle and similar tools — the ability to bridge natural language specs to formal proofs is the missing piece for wider adoption.
- For researchers: AI-assisted Lean proof writing is now at the stage where it's worth attempting on your own open problems, not just educational exercises.
- The Tao collaboration model (human provides insight, AI handles formalization) suggests the near-term workflow: focus your effort on the mathematical ideas, delegate the proof mechanics.
- Monitor the Lean/Mathlib ecosystem for AI tooling improvements — this is moving fast and the tools available in 6 months will be significantly better.
Terminology
Related Papers
Show HN: adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Code
Claude Code에서 최대 7개의 병렬 서브 에이전트가 각각 다른 관점으로 PR을 리뷰하고, 자동 수정까지 해주는 오픈소스 플러그인이다. 기존 /review나 CodeRabbit보다 실제 버그를 더 많이 잡는다고 주장하지만 커뮤니티에서는 복잡도와 실효성에 대한 회의론도 나왔다.
How Fast Does Claude, Acting as a User Space IP Stack, Respond to Pings?
Claude Code에게 IP 패킷을 직접 파싱하고 ICMP echo reply를 구성하도록 시켜서 실제로 ping에 응답하게 만든 실험으로, 'Markdown이 곧 코드이고 LLM이 프로세서'라는 아이디어를 네트워크 스택 수준까지 밀어붙인 재미있는 사례다.
Show HN: Git for AI Agents
AI 코딩 에이전트(Claude Code 등)가 수행한 모든 툴 호출을 자동으로 추적하고, 어떤 프롬프트가 어느 코드 줄을 작성했는지 blame까지 가능한 버전 관리 도구다.
Principles for agent-native CLIs
AI 에이전트가 CLI 도구를 더 잘 사용할 수 있도록 설계하는 원칙들을 정리한 글로, 에이전트가 CLI를 도구로 활용하는 빈도가 높아지면서 이 설계 방식이 실용적으로 중요해지고 있다.
Agent-harness-kit scaffolding for multi-agent workflows (MCP, provider-agnostic)
여러 AI 에이전트가 서로 역할을 나눠 협업할 수 있도록 조율하는 scaffolding 도구로, Vite처럼 설정 없이 빠르게 멀티 에이전트 파이프라인을 구성할 수 있다.
Show HN: Tilde.run – Agent sandbox with a transactional, versioned filesystem
AI 에이전트가 실제 프로덕션 데이터를 건드려도 롤백할 수 있는 격리된 샌드박스 환경을 제공하는 도구로, GitHub/S3/Google Drive를 하나의 버전 관리 파일시스템으로 묶어준다.